🔗 Share this article

It has been described as one of the largest deceptions of its type in the UK.

A total of 14 people have been sentenced for their role in a £28m plot to defraud in excess of 3,500 vacation property investors.

The targets were keen to get out of age-old vacation property deals and went looking for assistance.

A large number were from 60 and 80. Over 500 of them lost more than £10,000, and one individual paid more than £80,000.

Those victimized were subjected to aggressive presentations extending for six hours. They were financially worse off, owning valueless fake "points" and remained locked into expensive vacation property deals they frequently were unable to use.

The Firm At the Heart of the Deception

The firm at the centre of the fraud was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected customers' funds to fund the proprietors' lavish standard of living of private schools, high-end properties and private jets.

The man at the top of the firm, Mark Rowe, was given a 90-month jail time in January for conspiracy to defraud.

Recently, his wife one of the co-defendants was among the last group to learn their fate.

She received a two-year suspended jail sentence at Southwark Crown Court after admitting financial crime.

This has been a long time coming and marks a huge win for the people who spoke out, the authorities and legal representatives.

How the Probe Began

I first heard about the company emerged during the that particular year. The position was in the research department of a media outlet, producing current affairs programmes.

A friend pointed out that his mother had assumed the ownership of a holiday property in Spain and, after long-term use, had begun looking to exit the contract.

It is important to recall how widespread timeshares had become with British holidaymakers in the 1980s and 1990s.

Holiday ownership allowed families to occupy the same accommodation each season, or exchange their vacation periods with other owners who had apartments in other resorts. About 600,000 holiday enthusiasts took up that opportunity.

The first timeshare rush was paired with a lot of accounts about dishonest operators fraudulently marketing investments. They appeared frequently on consumer TV programmes.

The typical timeshare contract bound owners for many years.

In that period, those owners who had experienced their guaranteed place in the sun for a long time were getting older, and many were hoping to wave goodbye to their holiday properties.

A number had reduced ability to travel and found it difficult to access their apartments. A few just thought they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had passed away, in many cases leaving their heirs to inherit the deals - along with their regular contributions and upkeep costs.

The Investigation Progresses

And that's where the relative had found herself. She browsed the internet for solutions and came across SMT, a firm whose website assured to release her from her deal.

But, having paid a fee and booked a meeting with them, her family became suspicious.

Further research uncovered many victims claiming they had paid money and got nothing in return. Indeed, they had been left out of pocket. Significant sums.

Our team began investigating what was occurring. It was rapidly apparent that there were dubious individuals active in the timeshare resale sector.

One lawyer had hundreds of individual complaints waiting to sue the organization.

Reporters contacted people who had dealt with the organization and they all told the same story. They assumed the business would buy their property from them but when they participated in a session (for which they made an advance payment) they were informed there was no potential buyers.

In place of that, they were encouraged - indeed compelled - to commit further cash purchasing "the firm's incentive scheme", named after the outfit's parent company, the parent organization.

The nature of these rewards was somewhat vague. They sounded like a kind of currency, offering cheaper vacations and benefits and retail offers.

And they were reportedly "tradable" with other owners, eventually.

Committing funds up front now would result in an eventual payoff that would cover the company's charges and leave the timeshare holder in profit, liberated eventually from their pesky agreement.

An unrealistic promise? Certainly, that proved correct.

A 'Deceptive Scam'

If these accounts were accurate, this was a massive scam.

It's what is called a "deceptive marketing."

An operator - in this case the organization - "lures the customer by advertising a specific service but then to say that's not available, pushing the customer to an alternative, lesser offering.

That's illegal. Possessing all the testimony we had gathered, we presented the rationale to secretly film one of the firm's consultations.

The process requires commitment, energy, and strong justifications for why this is the only way to obtain the evidence necessary to demonstrate illegal activity.

With approval secured, our limited crew set up a meeting with one of the organization's staff in the location.

Pretending to be a potential client aiming to assist his parent released from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement